I popped down to Boston today to see Litl’s internet computer and catch up with friends who now work for Litl. Unfortunately I did not see Havoc there (probably release partying too much or more likely coding) but a number of GNOME folk and others who I worked with at OLPC did show up. (I’m not going to name names because I will inevitably leave someone out).
In any case the Litl webbook looks promising. Finally someone has looked at what a target group of consumers wanted and designed a simplified interface around services instead of just dropping a Linux distribution in and saying here you go. Did they hit the mark, only time can tell but for Linux on devices to win in this area we need this sort of targeted design instead of chasing the windows generic computing market. It is how Apple won with the iPod and iPhone. Anyone who reads my blog should know my stance on this issue so I won’t beat it to death.
Some key innovative features here are
- Browser centric design
- Easel mode in which the UI accommodates the device’s configuration
- Instant sharing and mobile configs – if one breaks you can log in from another and continue whatever you were doing
- Almost zero maintenance and setup (you still need to tell it who your friends are)
Sure we have some of these features being developed in GNOME (it doesn’t come as a surprise since a lot of the UI is based on work done in GNOME and other GNOME related projects like the OLPC) but this is the first complete commercial offering which brings those features into one consumer friendly device with a laptop form factor.
As someone who is proud of GNOME’s accomplishments I wish Litl the best of luck and thank them for the code they have contributed back to the community. As a Foundation member I hope to see even more collaboration between them and the foundation in the future. Keep up the awesome work!!!
[read this post in: ar de es fr it ja ko pt ru zh-CN ]
It may be that Havoc rushed home anticipating the arrival of the Havoclet.
Comment by C. Scott Ananian — November 4, 2009 @ 11:31 pm
I like the design of the litl and the UI looks promising, but it’s too expensive.
if they could have launched it at $299 or $399 subsidized via some cloud partner, there would be more hype and interest, but consumers can get a much more useful device that isn’t cloud dependent for well under $700
If I limited the functionality of my computer to litl’s capabilities and nothing more… it too would be maintenance free.
I definitely think there is a market for the device, and it would be great if Google bought them and sold (or gave it away) as a Google Business Apps computer.
Unfortunately, even though they may have a good thing in the moment, like Palm Inc. their good idea probably won’t survive the crowded market.
I do think there is tons of untapped potential for Senior Citizens who want less complicated technology… and first time computer buyers who aren’t kids…
I’ll cheer them on, but honestly will probably buy the Apple Slate instead because I’ll get more power and versatility for about the same price.
Comment by Bob Dow — November 5, 2009 @ 1:46 pm
Too little. too late. and too expensive.
Comment by RJ — November 7, 2009 @ 4:25 pm