One of my biggest pet peeves is this argument:
You’ve done ***************** this much “good” so you are obligated to do more (and to my benefit first). If you don’t do so the world will implode.
I especially hate it when the person making that argument benefits from that good but doesn’t think they should contribute to it.
I do however agree with this argument:
You have done ******************* this much “good” and as a result have benefited from that good on average more than others, you have an obligation to keep putting in as much as you can. I am a beneficiary of your good and will try to add to it but I may lack the ability to contribute in any meaningful way.
On the philosophical side:
Is it more moral to get paid for the above arguments’ “good”, which frees you up to do more of the “good” or to do something else for a living with results being the scope of your “good” contributions are less than they would have been?
Those questions I don’t think there is a real answer to.
And no Spot, I’m not going to suddenly quit, I just sometimes wonder why I chose to be a public free software developer when it means I have to deal with anonymous idiots or break my own moral code on censorship.
[read this post in:
ar de es fr it ja ko pt ru zh-CN ]
Ah the recent spate of technology bashing reminds me of when D-Bus, Hal and udev were young and inexperienced. Many people yearned for the days of automounter, cried bloody murder when Wine couldn’t find their cdrom and their favourite command line tool just couldn’t grok the new device syntax.
What’s that? The technology matured and now people would rise up in arms if we ever reverted to the old days? To be fair we do try not to break things but some things are broken already and are being barely held together by dead kittens and fairy dust.
As I said when we completely broke D-Bus to move to the new wire protocol (0.2x-0.3x) – sure there are growing pains involved but in time people will just get on with their lives and it will become another layer of the system that nobody cares about because it just works. It pays to take the time to fix things right even if there will be pain in between.
[read this post in:
ar de es fr it ja ko pt ru zh-CN ]
For only cents a day, less than a cup of coffee, or Brondo(it’s got what plants crave) , you can make sure a GNOME hacker has all the resources they need to hack late into the night and into the early morning. So become a friend of GNOME and donate $10 a month. Doing so will make you elegeable to receive a signed postcard from your favourite hacker (only valid for participating hackers) . You can even watch their progress through their personal blog and see what a difference you have made. Remember, as of today I am not just the GNOME Board’s Treasurer, I’m also a Friend because everyone needs friends.
Disclaimer: Donations do not go to individual hackers you specify (though feel free to thank them directly via a gift or even better, a thank you and pat on the back – just not when they are sleeping, that is kind of creepy). The money you donate to the Foundation goes into the general Foundation budget and helps ensure that GNOME continues to be a free (as in libre) and open source desktop by providing resources to developers, software and education for end users and promotion for GNOME worldwide.
[read this post in:
ar de es fr it ja ko pt ru zh-CN ]