http://www.j5live.com/2007/07/08/python-3000-impact-for-d-bus-and-sugar/ Where the urethane hits the pavement Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:34:18 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.j5live.com/2007/07/08/python-3000-impact-for-d-bus-and-sugar/comment-page-1/#comment-18665 Eduardo Padoan Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:18:35 +0000 http://www.j5live.com/?p=389#comment-18665 Ops, I meant "its good to see you enthusiasm." Ops, I meant “its good to see you enthusiasm.”

]]> http://www.j5live.com/2007/07/08/python-3000-impact-for-d-bus-and-sugar/comment-page-1/#comment-18664 Eduardo Padoan Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:16:54 +0000 http://www.j5live.com/?p=389#comment-18664 Nice post, good to your enthusiasm. I have just a litle comment: """ Python is getting typed…sort of. Methods and functions will be able to specify a type for its parameters and return value. These are only annotations and do not have any meaning to python. For instance: """ Hehe, Python *is* typed (strongly and dynamically), and the function annotation thing is *not* typing annotation -- it can be, if you use some kind of decorator that enforces it, but, it is more like another kind of documentation, probably to appear in help(), along with the docstring. Looking foward to Python 3.0 here too!!! Nice post, good to your enthusiasm.
I have just a litle comment:
“”"
Python is getting typed…sort of. Methods and functions will be able to specify a type for its parameters and return value. These are only annotations and do not have any meaning to python. For instance:
“”"
Hehe, Python *is* typed (strongly and dynamically), and the function annotation thing is *not* typing annotation — it can be, if you use some kind of decorator that enforces it, but, it is more like another kind of documentation, probably to appear in help(), along with the docstring.
Looking foward to Python 3.0 here too!!!

]]>