Comments on: Generating excitement in GNOME http://www.j5live.com/2007/04/25/generating-excitement-in-gnome/ Where the urethane hits the pavement Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:34:18 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: erik http://www.j5live.com/2007/04/25/generating-excitement-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-18577 erik Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:00:16 +0000 http://www.j5live.com/?p=360#comment-18577 The a few screenshots of the "slab menu" for instance created excitement. Then it didn't make it in the release, disappointing a lot of people.. It's nice that it's available from the apt repositories anyways :p So yeah, please do that, but try to make sure that it all also leads into some results (when possible). The a few screenshots of the “slab menu” for instance created excitement. Then it didn’t make it in the release, disappointing a lot of people.. It’s nice that it’s available from the apt repositories anyways :p

So yeah, please do that, but try to make sure that it all also leads into some results (when possible).

]]> By: pclouds http://www.j5live.com/2007/04/25/generating-excitement-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-18576 pclouds Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:17:26 +0000 http://www.j5live.com/?p=360#comment-18576 But "sneak peek" sounds much more exciting than "experimental" or "extra" ;) But “sneak peek” sounds much more exciting than “experimental” or “extra” ;)

]]> By: Rahul Sundaram http://www.j5live.com/2007/04/25/generating-excitement-in-gnome/comment-page-1/#comment-18575 Rahul Sundaram Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:33:21 +0000 http://www.j5live.com/?p=360#comment-18575 I would recommend calling them "experimental" or "extra" set rather than sneak peek. Sneak peek sets the expectation that these modules WILL be in the subsequent releases while the names I propose do not have these implications. The advantage is that you can throw away components which don't have any future. I would recommend calling them “experimental” or “extra” set rather than sneak peek. Sneak peek sets the expectation that these modules WILL be in the subsequent releases while the names I propose do not have these implications. The advantage is that you can throw away components which don’t have any future.

]]>